Clinicians aim to identify and distinguish harmful from harmless abnormalities.1 In sports medicine, measures of physical function such as strength, balance and joint flexibility are used as diagnostic tools to identify causes of pain and disability, and monitor progression in response to an intervention. Comparing results from clinical measures against ‘normal’ values guides decision-making regarding health outcomes. Understanding ‘normal’ is therefore central to appropriate management of pain and disability.
Dividing populations into ‘normal’ versus ‘diseased’ largely overlooks the heterogeneity of the healthy population.2 Particularly as disease, pain and sickness are expected occurrences of being human, understanding ‘normal’ at each stage of the lifespan is essential to avoid the medicalisation of usual life processes.3 However, ‘normal’ is difficult to clarify and definitions are dependent on context.
In clinical settings, ‘normal’ is used in various ways and this can lead to confusion. ‘Normal’ is used…
British Journal of Sports Medicine current issue